As mobile marketing evolves, so do its risks.
The Federal Trade Commission last month released its updated “Dot Com” guidelines. An update long in coming — the first since the report was released in 2000 — the guidelines take special note of mobile.
In short, they state that the same rules that apply to ads in newspapers, radio and television apply to mobile devices — and social media too, for that matter. All disclosures must be clear and conspicuous.
Furthermore, if a disclosure cannot be made clearly on a device or platform, then that device or platform should not be used, the FTC said.
Now mobile marketers can add regulatory risk to their list of concerns. If the FTC hadn’t been inclined to crack down too hard on obscure mobile ad disclosures before, it will surely take a harder position now that it’s released its new guidelines.
Misinterpreting Content, Security Concerns
Ad disclosures are just one of many challenges for mobile advertisers, however.
Others include reconciling inconsistent content that may have to be replicated over mobile channels versus traditional channels, and addressing new security concerns such as data being stolen from a mobile device or a mobile app being cracked, said Pegasystems Senior Director of Product Marketing Steve Kraus.
“There is also a risk that information is misinterpreted based on how it may be poorly presented on a mobile device,” he told CRM Buyer.
Security is also top of mind for Syed Hasan, CEO of ResponseTek.
“Mobile CRM is potentially full of highly confidential company and customer information,” he told CRM Buyer. “We live in a world where people do not protect their mobile devices in the same way that they do other devices that can access business systems, such as laptops or desktops.”
Furthermore, mobile devices are typically more social than personal laptops and are often handed to friends or family to use, he continued. “This combination of access to confidential information on a device that is typically unsecured can provide significant risk to a business.”
The annoyance factor is a serious risk, noted Minoo Patel, VP of the mobility and social media practice at NIIT Technologies. Usability on small form factors is always an issue.
In addition, “care needs to be taken to ensure that marketing applications maintain the right level of interruption so that the consumers do not find the app too intrusive to be of value,” Patel told CRM Buyer.
Annoyance can be a factor in-house as well, Marci Weisler, COO of EachScape, told CRM Buyer.
One potential issue is the updating process, she said — for example, when a retailer rolls out an in-house app for sales associates.
“Retailers who go in this direction must be sure they have the right networks accessible or in place, and a mechanism for updating info either on regular schedules or real time,” advised Weisler, “so that any recent info that is needed for a seamless customer experience is at their fingertips.”
If the updating process is not in place, a tool that was set up to bolster productivity and make sales staff’s jobs easier could backfire and hurt the brand by creating confusion, she concluded.
This is true from the customer’s perspective as well, Weisler noted. It is important for a retailer, say, to view its customers holistically.
“She is the same customer online and offline and may have multiple buying patterns, but they need to be united into a common profile so that she is viewed as a single entity,” explained Weisler. “Online rewards should complement offline rewards, and sales associates need to be able to leverage online buying patterns to drive both online and offline sales, and should be incentivized properly to do so.”
Stay tuned for Part 2: Reducing the risks.