In an analysis released Thursday criticizing the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, market research company Gartner Dataquest said a “radicalreform” of telecom policy is needed if the rollout of high-speedInternet services, or broadband, is ever to break out of the slow lane.
“The insistence of some regulators, such as the U.S. FederalCommunications Commission, to define every nuance of what an operatorshould and should not do has been the bane of the telecom industry,” RonCowles, principal analyst for Gartner’s telecommunications andnetworking group, wrote in the report.
‘Contentious and Litigious’
The report recommended that regulators take a broader approach toguiding the industry, adding that they must find the right balancebetween “incentives, requirements, competition and monopolies,” then sit back and let the market do the rest.
“Rather than trying to micromanage every little aspect ofregulation, the regulators should be setting the principles of operationand then allowing the industry to negotiate bilateral and multilateralinterconnection agreements and settlements,” the report stated.
It also noted that regulators’ failure to follow this path has resulted in an “increasingly contentious and litigious” telecom environment.
Strong Shall Inherit
The research company has criticized telecommunications regulators before, both in the United States and elsewhere. Gartner spokesperson Christy Pettey told the E-Commerce Times that the present analysis grew out of previous surveys and reports Gartner has conducted.
According to Gartner’s analysis, small companies were given false hope that they could compete in a market that requires vast reserves of capital.
“The emphasis on having many competitors rather than strongcompetition has been the root of the problem in many countries,particularly in the United States and in the European Union,” said Gartnerresearch director Jean-Claude Delcroix.
“Many small players who were encouraged by national telecom regulators to launchinto a highly capital-intensive service environment simply could notcounter the market presence of strong incumbent players,” Delcroix added.
Baby Bells Complain
Some industry observers seem to believe high-speed Internet access can save the struggling high-tech sector and spur growth of the presently sluggish economy.
Broadband issues are the subject of intense lobbing in Washington, D.C., with legislators introducing competing bills intended to spur broadband deployment. President George W. Bush also has called for faster growth.
At the heart of the issue is competition between the four so-called “Baby Bells,” or local phone companies, and the cable companies.
The Baby Bells have long complained that cable, satellite and wireless broadband providers do not face the sameregulatory hurdles as sellers of digital subscriber line (DSL) and other telephone-based broadband delivery services.
In order to better compete against cable, the local phone companies say, they need a level regulatory playing field. Currently, cable television companies control about 68 percent of the broadband market.
The dueling bills are the latest salvo in a war that has dragged on for years in the United States’ lucrative but slow-to-roll-out broadband industry.
“There’s a firestorm going on out there,” Cowles told the E-Commerce Times. “Everybody, regardless of the future potential for profits or meeting customer requirements, is hell-bent on hanging on to what they’ve got.”