Welcome | Sign In
CRMBuyer.com
Internet

ICANN Approves Dot-KitchenSink Internet Address Policy

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
ICANN Approves Dot-KitchenSink Internet Address Policy

The Internet is about to get a lot crazier. Anyone who's willing to fork over a fairly grand sum, possibly in the $100,00 ball park, will be able to buy the rights to a branded domain. That means no one who's anyone will be a lowly dot-com anymore -- and the practice of snatching up domain names with the hope of selling them for big bucks later will be a lot less lucrative.


To thrive in today’s highly competitive business environment, you need innovative approaches to attract and retain customers. Click here to see how Salesforce.com, West Marine, and VForce-AAA Ohio use LiveOps to optimize their customer experiences.

The universe of Internet domains will soon experience a Big Bang, thanks to Thursday's vote by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) approving a new system for handing out Web addresses.

Corporations and other public and private entities will no longer be limited to Web extensions like .com, .net or .org; for a fee that will likely start at US$100,000, a company can register a more personalized top-level domain (TLD) with its own brand name extension, such as .coke, .apple or .prada. Cities will be able to apply for .newyork, .berlin or .moscow.

ICANN also voted for the first time to allow non-Roman characters in Web addresses, which means that Chinese companies can register suffixes in Mandarin script, Russian companies in Cyrillic, and so on.

Beginning in spring 2009, the Internet address possibilities will truly be .endless.

New Addresses = New Approval Process

A new review process will govern multiple requests for the same address or for potentially objectionable domain names. Companies owning a particular brand name (Coke, Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), etc.) will have the first chance at registration.

The new process must also deal with the issue of cybersquatting, where unscrupulous individuals or companies buy domain names -- and all their potential variations, including typographical errors -- and then seek money from the trademark holders.

"The money should keep the cybersquatters away," Ernest Grumbles III, a trademark and intellectual property attorney with Merchant & Gould, told TechNewsWorld. "There are a lot of stakeholders that ICANN has to report to ... the large brand owners. I could see with a top level domain costing that much, it may reduce [illegal] activity."

Opportunities or New Problems?

The new name-vetting process will be key in avoiding other digital legal quagmires, Grumbles said. "If they come up with a nice nimble process, it may work." But he's not so sure about the idea of auctioning off domains if several entities seek the same address. "I'd almost prefer a lottery."

There's another advantage to the higher fees besides chasing away cybersquatters: "ICANN is going to make a big pile of money," Grumbles said. "They're looking into the process of trying to get themselves independent and out from any kind of government control. So this will be a good fundraising effort for them."


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Renay San Miguel


More by Renay San Miguel

Is the Chatroulette Sleazefest Giving Video Chat a Bad Name?
March 15, 2010
What do you get when you put webcams into the hands of millions of people? If you look to Chatroulette for clues to that question, the answer is probably one that you'd rather forget. Don't let the Chatroulette media blitz fool you, though -- webcams can do much more than satisfy humanity's more lurid curiosities.
Old Dogs, a Straying Audience and New Media Tricks
March 12, 2010
There's a word for the kind of experienced print and broadcast professional who's trying to get smart as quickly as possible in the ways of digital and social media: Call them Old New Media Dogs. They're the ones applying their skills to new forms of media in order to reach the new audience's changing set of loyalties: away from certain media brands and toward individual, trusted reporters.
EFF Knocks Apple for Dumping on Devs
March 10, 2010
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has nabbed a copy of the secret agreement Apple requires developers to sign before they can sell applications through its App Store. The contract includes restrictions on selling through other app outlets, a $50 limit on Apple's liability, and a ban on talking about the contract publicly. Does Apple have the right to run its show the way it wants, or is its style cramping innovation?
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network