Welcome | Sign In
CRMBuyer.com
News

Feds Bust 18 in Fraudulent Online Pharma

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
Feds Bust 18 in Fraudulent Online Pharma

Eighteen people involved in an Internet pharmacy could face between three and 20 years in prison for each of the many charges against them, along with millions of dollars in fines, for the illegal sale of prescription drugs. A federal grand jury in San Diego has indicted these individuals, who were involved with Affpower, an online pharmaceutical distribution network.


To thrive in today’s highly competitive business environment, you need innovative approaches to attract and retain customers. Click here to see how Salesforce.com, West Marine, and VForce-AAA Ohio use LiveOps to optimize their customer experiences.

A federal grand jury in San Diego has indicted 18 people involved in an Internet pharmacy that took in US$126 million from the illegal sale of prescription drugs, Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher of the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of California Karen Hewitt announced Thursday.

Among those charged in the 313-count indictment were three physicians, two pharmacists, one pharmacy operator, a credit card processor and the operators of eight Web sites affiliated with Affpower, an online pharmaceutical distribution network with operations in the United States and abroad.

The defendants were charged variously with racketeering and conspiracy to commit racketeering; distribution and dispensing of controlled substances and conspiracy to distribute and dispense controlled substances; mail and wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud; conspiracy to commit money laundering; and conspiracy to dispense and dispensing of misbranded drugs with the intent to defraud and mislead.

If convicted, they face between three and 20 years in prison for each of the many charges, along with millions of dollars in fines.

Global Operation

"The fraudulent and illegal sale of prescription drugs over the Internet poses a serious threat to the health of Americans who turn to the Internet in their need for pharmaceuticals," Fisher said. "The defendants allegedly exploited that need and provided little or no doctor review while prescribing possibly dangerous drugs, even as they generated millions of dollars in revenues for themselves."

Affpower -- with administrative headquarters in Costa Rica, accounting and computer servers in Cyprus, and a credit card processor in Israel -- allegedly received more than 1 million Internet orders for controlled and noncontrolled prescription pharmaceuticals from customers in all 50 states between August 2004 and June 2006.

According to the indictment, the drugs were sold through numerous Web sites to customers without prescriptions; a group of doctors affiliated with the site were paid $3 per order to issue prescriptions based on customer Learn how SugarCRM will improve your business. Free Trial. Click here. answers to a simple questionnaire. The doctors had no contact with the customers for whom they wrote prescriptions, and typically reviewed hundreds of orders per day, the indictment charges.

The doctors allegedly wrote prescriptions that were inappropriate or dangerous for a particular customer on some occasions, and in some cases, orders were never reviewed by a doctor at all, but were instead approved by a nonphysician member of the Affpower staff who had allegedly stolen the identity of a licensed physician and issued prescriptions in his or her name.

'Heartening News'

"These indictments are heartening news of combined government efforts to protect the public by stopping online prescription drug trafficking," Susan Foster, vice president and director of policy research and analysis at The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University, told the E-Commerce Times.

"While these sites are difficult to track because they can keep changing their Web addresses or operate offshore, the San Diego decision shows that it can be done," Foster added.

Indeed, such enterprises are generally set up with operations around the globe "such that it's almost impossible for individuals to be caught," David Festinger, senior scientist with the Treatment Research Institute, told the E-Commerce Times. "It's refreshing to know that law enforcement can get a hold of these thugs."

The indictments provide further evidence that the Internet is emerging as a new channel for drug dealers, Festinger added. Between the ease with which controlled substances can now be purchased online, and the relative anonymity with which they can be obtained, the Internet represents an important development in the sale of illicit drugs, he said.

The New Predators

"These types of sales are no longer relegated to the back alley or require close association with 'the fringe,'" Festinger explained. Particularly when it comes to controlled pharmaceuticals with real, medical names such as Vicodin, the result may be the feeling for users of a legitimate, medical transaction, he added.

That's especially worrisome for children and adolescents, Festinger said. "Each day millions of youth access the Internet and risk being exposed to online drug sellers, which we consider a new type of predator," he said.

Controlled medications are now even outpacing traditional illicit drugs such as heroin or cocaine in the rate at which they are abused. "In general, the figures for using pharmaceutical narcotics are staggeringly high -- much higher than anything else," Philip Heymann, professor of law at Harvard Law School, told the E-Commerce Times.

The Overseas Challenge

"These drugs are readily available online, and it's very important that online pharmacies be forced to demand prescriptions for them," Heymann said.

Of course, it remains to be seen how well organizations like the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) can cope with online pharmacies that operate entirely from overseas, he added.

"I continue to think the big problem is and will be overseas pharmacies," Heymann concluded. "The real coup will be when we have a system for dealing with them."


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Katherine Noyes


More by Katherine Noyes

Viacom v. YouTube: Finger-Pointing Turns to Mud-Slinging
March 19, 2010
Court documents in Viacom's billion-dollar lawsuit against Google suggest that both companies engaged in some shenanigans in the run-up to the long-running legal brawl -- and neither has been pulling its punches in court. "Viacom makes a strong showing for pervasive and rampant copyright infringement," said copyright attorney Raymond van Dyke. Google, however, "gives as good as it gets."
Amazon Wrangles Publishers as iBookstore Grand Opening Looms
March 19, 2010
Apple's newest charmed pair, the iPad and the iBookstore, will amble onto the publishing scene in just a couple of weeks, and Amazon is justifiably fearful. Its popular Kindle may quickly become a has-been, and it could lose hard-won ground in the e-book marketplace. What's a giant to do? Twist a few arms. If publishers bow to Amazon's latest terms, will e-book prices rise or fall?
A Tale of 20 Interns, 1 Project and 1 Fiery 'Mythical Man-Month' Debate
March 18, 2010
Did startup Ksplice disprove Brooks' Mythical Man-Month Theory with an army of student interns from MIT? What Ksplice did "is nothing like what the MMM is talking about, which is a single large monolithic project, where the time wasted getting the new help up to speed and checking their progress will often cost you the very gains you wished to see in the first place," said Slashdot blogger hairyfeet.
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network