Welcome | Sign In
CRMBuyer.com
News

Microsoft Sues EU Over Code Revelation Requirement

Print Version
E-Mail Article
Reprints
Microsoft Sues EU Over Code Revelation Requirement

Though it has moved to comply, Microsoft is still fighting the overall ruling against it. That appeal will likely take months -- if not years -- to be heard, however, and courts have refused to stay the penalties in the meantime. The opening of the code was immediately identified by analysts as the part of the sanctions that would most likely cause Microsoft to balk.


Reading the Avaya-Nortel Roadmap requires a navigator
The release of the Avaya-Nortel roadmap has many people wondering what lies ahead for their customer contact initiatives. Join Ovum’s Ian Jacobs and Aspect CTO Gary Barnett to discuss how the integration of two product lines may affect you. Register for the webinar.

In the latest chapter of what's become an epic legal battle, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) has filed suit against the European Union, hoping to have a court provide guidance on what parts of its source code it must reveal.

Microsoft filed with the Court of First Instance for review of a provision of the sweeping anti-trust penalties levied against the software giant last year. The European Commission ordered Microsoft to pay a record US$621 million fine, to un-bundle the Media Player software from Windows and to provide a look at its source code to other software makers so they could create compatible products.

Click here for LiveOps

Sharing the Wealth

Even though the company has reportedly paid the fine already and has said it's ready to deliver a stripped-down version of Windows -- though the name and pricing of that product has been at issue -- the provision to share code has long been a sticking point for the software maker.

While Microsoft attempted to strike a compromise to let parts of its code be licensed to server makers and others, open-source supporters in Europe wanted the code to become public, which would enable vast numbers of developers to work on products to work with it, much as happens with other types of open-source software.

Microsoft has objected to that approach, calling its source code one of its most valuable pieces of intellectual property. Microsoft instead favors strict licensing agreements that include non-disclosure rules. The suit asks a court to clarify whether Microsoft's terms would be sufficient to comply with the anti-trust ruling.

Sensitive Issue

Though it has moved to comply, Microsoft is still fighting the overall ruling against it. That appeal will likely take months -- if not years -- to be heard, however, and courts have refused to stay the penalties in the meantime.

The opening of the code was immediately identified by analysts as the part of the sanctions that would most likely cause Microsoft to balk.

"Over the years, Microsoft has guarded its source code very carefully," said Yankee Group senior analyst Laura DiDio. That's understandable in some ways since the company spent years and millions of dollars developing the proprietary code. "It's been very measured in how it's approached complying with that particular part of the sanctions."

The European Commission has left open the possibility of issuing fines against Microsoft for failing to comply fully with the penalty terms. The original ruling from March of 2004 gives the commission the power to fine Microsoft as much as $5 million per day if it is found to be out of compliance.

Drawing the Line

The exact scheme for revealing source code is not the only detail that's still in dispute, with Microsoft and the EU still unable to agree on who should be appointed to monitor Microsoft for ongoing compliance.

Microsoft has moved to clear away as many of the outstanding legal actions pending against it in recent years, reaching huge settlements with the likes of AOL and Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq: JAVA) as well as smaller deals with individual states. It still faces a private anti-trust suit from RealNetworks (Nasdaq: RNWK).

The effort to clear away long-dangling legal cases is as much about public relations and focus as about eliminating potential liabilities, said Enderle Group principal analyst Rob Enderle.

"Microsoft recognizes that its better off in the long run if it can focus on competing and innovating," Enderle told the E-Commerce Times. "But it's clear they have limits to how far they're willing to go to make that happen."


Print Version E-Mail Article Reprints More by Keith Regan


More by Keith Regan

Yahoo Slaps Fresh Coat of Gloss on Microsoft Deal Defense
June 30, 2008
With its shareholders meeting set to take place in less than five weeks, Yahoo has put together a 32-page presentation, emphasizing why the investors should vote to keep the current board in place. The company also reiterated why it chose to partner with Google instead of letting Microsoft buy part of it.
French Court Stings eBay With $63M Judgment Over Knockoff Sales
June 30, 2008
eBay is planning to appeal a ruling by a French court that ordered it to pay $63 million to the luxury goods maker Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessey. The court also barred the online auctioneer from selling four brands of perfume on its Web sites accessible in France.
New Auto Loan Leads Marketplace Shifts Into Drive
June 30, 2008
Reply.com's move into the auto finance market is a logical one the company, as automotive advertising spending is moving online in increasingly greater amounts. The company is partnering with the Detroit Trading Company to create a massive repository of auto finance leads online.
Don't miss a story -- sign up for our FREE e-mail newsletters and view the latest headlines at a glance.
Tech News Flash [ View Sample ]
E-Commerce Minute [ View Sample ]
ECT News Network Weekly Newsletter [ View Sample ]
Shortcuts
ECT News Network Information
Reader Services
Corporate
ECT News Network